As said previously mentioned, the SIPOA agreed. But it was Erroneous to do so. It was not the SIPOA’s location to unilaterally abandon the easement, given that other functions had special property interest in it – namely, the owners of heaps 21-28 that benefitted with the drainage easement. Faisal Mumtaz https://stephendxgms.theobloggers.com/37302661/the-ultimate-guide-to-easements-and-rights-of-way-lawyer-in-karachi-near-me